99% of what we see about what AI can do is basically hype, especially stuff from VC’s (Venture Capitalists) or other leaders in companies that have invested in AI. Then you have people like Marc Andreessen who seem to be living in an alternate reality all together because that’s the only explanation I have for them making statements like the one below. I mean it is an interesting take that your super power AI will be able to generate actual art like paintings, books and poems etc but not be able to be a VC because ‘it (being a VC) is more art than science.’ I mean if it can generate actual art (that doesn’t suck) what is stopping it from doing a VC job even if it more ‘art’ than science? After all you are claiming that it can perform other intangible skills so why not your job?
Marc Andreessen says when AI does everything else, VC might be one of the last jobs still done by humans. It’s more art than science.
The funny part is that an AI can actually do a VC’s job more easily than create art that that people like. I would love to have an AI that actually works. I mean, I am a Sci-Fi fan, so yeah I would absolutely geek out about AI in real. Unfortunately what we have now is nothing close to being intelligent and that just sucks.
– Suramya